Operation
Coronet
  Operation
Olympic
  Operation
Sealion
   
 
   
Operation Sealion

German Forces
   Army
   Kriegsmarine
   Luftwaffe

Barges

Famous Quotes

Problems

Sealion & Barbarossa



Sealion Facts

Sealion Maps



Books
   Hitler Options
   Invasion
   Invasion!
   Invasion, 1940
   Operation Sea Lion
   SS-GB

DVDs
   It Happened Here


Our Other Military Sites

World War II
Operation Barbarossa
1941 German Invasion of Russia
Operation Citadel
1943 The Battle of Kursk
Operation Dragoon
1944 Invasion of southern France
Operation Varsity
1945 Crossing the Rhine

Invasions That Never Were
Operation Sealion
1940 German invasion of England
Operation Olympic
1945 US invasion of southern Japan
Operation Coronet
1946 US invasion of northern Japan

Special Forces
Operation Entebbe
1976 Entebbe Airport Rescue
Operation Nimrod
1980 Iranian Embassy Siege

British Cold War Operations
Operation Musketeer
1956 Suez Crisis
Operation Corporate
1982 Falklands War
Operation Black Buck
1982 Vulcan raids on Port Stanley
Operation Granby
1990-91 Persian Gulf

British Post Cold War
Operation Herrick
2002- Afghanistan

 
   
Operation Sealion   >   Problems

   
 

Problems with Operation Sealion


There are many reasons to believe that had the Germans attempted Operation Sealion, perhaps even after gaining air superiority in a different Battle of Britain, that they operation would have ended in failure. These problems include:
  1. The Royal Navy was vastly superior the the Kriegsmarine:

    British ships available for anti-invasion duties outnumbered the German Navy (Kriegsmarine) at least 5:1 in every category of large vessel. Additionally, the Royal Navy had access to many smaller craft such as sloops, minesweepers, trawlers, etc., that while not particularly useful against warships, would probably have been able to cause havoc against the Rhine barges that the Germans planned to use to transport their landing force.

    The standard argument that if the Germans had gained air superiority they would have been able to sink the British vessels does not really stand up to much scrutiny. During the Dunkirk evacuation, despite having control of the air for long periods, and despite the ships spending a lot of time stationary in the harbour (loading), the Luftwaffe was able to sink only 4 of the 39 Royal Navy destroyers which took place in the operation.

    Additionally, the Germans hoped to use submarines and mines to prevent the Royal Navy from entering the Channel. Even if they had succeeded with this, the Royal Navy already had 17 destroyers and 3 light cruisers based within the Channel. The Germans had no real plan for dealing with these ships, other than that their troops on their barges should open fire on any unidentified ships!

    HMS Prince of Wales:
    HMS Prince of Wales

  2. The Luftwaffe was inadequate for the tasks required of it:

    The German plan demanded rather a lot from their airforce. The Luftwaffe was expected to:

    • Gain air superiority over the RAF.
    • Prevent the Royal Navy from entering the English Channel and interfering with the invasion barges.
    • Act as flying artillery for the German troops in England (who were not bringing much actual artillery with them).
    • Prevent movement of British Army reinforcements by bombing railroad lines.
    • Bomb London to cause a mass exodus of refugees, thus clogging the roads.

    The ambitiousness of these goals can be realized when one considers the fact that the total number of Spitfires and Hurricanes available to the RAF, and the number of Messerschmitts available to the Luftwaffe, were about equal (although the Germans didn't realize this at the time) - and that British were actually producing new fighters more quickly than the Germans. An additional British advantage is that they would be mostly flying over home territory (which meant more time in the air, and a higher chance that pilots who parachuted from their aircraft would be able to fight again), whereas the Germans would not.

    Messerschmitt BF-109E:
    Messerschmitt BF-109E

    Even if the Germans had managed to achieve air superiority over Southeast England, that would not have been the end of their troubles. In this eventuality, the British had plans to withdraw their fighters to the Midlands where they would have been able to continue the fight out of range of German fighters. Furthermore, RAF Bomber Command would surely not have remained inactive, but would most likely have been bombing the German invasion barges - and defending them from an attack would have been yet another task for the overstretched Luftwaffe.

  3. German invasion barges were inadequate:

    Lacking purpose-built invasion craft, the Germans planned to use barges from the Rhine and elsewhere to carry their landing force to England. However, these craft were flat-bottomed and unsuitable, liable to sink, in even slightly rough seas: in fact, many of the craft could have been sank by merely be the wake of passing fast destroyer!

    Crewing the barges was also a major problem. The Kriegsmarine estimated at least 20,000 extra crew would be required to man these barges. After stripping men from its warships (which surely would have damaged their operational efficiency), as well as finding every other person with nautical experience in other military branches, or in civilian life, they were able to rustle up 16,000: 4,000 less than the minimum required.

    German invasion barges being assembled in Boulogne, France:
    German invasion barges being assembled in Boulogne, France

    The Germans concluded that they would be unable to bring heavy equipment (such as artillery) with them, and would have to improvise. Nevertheless, since the army used horses for a variety of purposes, they planned to bring 4,000 horses with the first wave of the invasion fleet. To avoid the difficulty of loading horses on barges, they planned to place the horses on rafts towed by the barges (despite the fact that many of the rafts sank during tests). The barges themselves would be towed by tugs (two barges per tug), at would take up to 30 hours to cross the Channel.

    Even this was not the end of the problems: the Germans planned for the barges to cross the Channel in columns, then for them to sail parallel to the coast until in a line formation, and then for the barges to turn again and advance towards the coast all at the same time. All of this was supposed to happen at night coordinated by loud hailers, without any rehearsals, and within insufficient numbers of crew with nautical experience.

  4. The invasion force was inadequate to defeat the British Army:

    While it is true that the British Army was depleted after the debacle in France, they still had significant forces, including a fair amount artillery. The Germans on the other hand planned to bring no artillery with them, and would have struggled to overcome even antiquated obstacles such as the Royal Military Canal (completed in 1809) or Martello towers (also dating to the early 19th century).

  5. Resupply would have been problematic:

    Obviously the German invasion force would soon be in trouble unless it could be resupplied. For this purpose, the German's needed to capture a port, and they decided on Dover. However, the port was well-defended by the British, and as if to compound their problems, the Germans planned to make their parachute drop more than 10 miles (16 kilometers) from the port.
Of course, nobody can be absolutely sure what would have happened had the Germans attempted to invade England, but it does seem like it would have been an extremely difficult operation. When one considers all the difficulties that the Germans faced, it does seem that there was at least some possibility of the invasion turning into a disaster.

Another way to look at the issue is to realize that despite years of preparation, historic traditions and recent experiene in amphibious operation, and overwhelming superiority in the air, at sea, and in numbers of troops, the Allied invasion of Normandy in 1944, was no walkover. Compare that with an improvised German invasion of England, with difficulties in the air, at sea, and in terms of ground equipment, and one has to question what would have happened if Sealion had gone ahead.

Perhaps the most likely scenario is that the Germans would have been able to land and establish a beachhead, but then find themselves cut off by the Royal Navy. Inevitably they would eventually run out of supplies and have no choice but to surrender. A major wargame that was carried out at Sandhurst in 1974, produced exactly that result.


Your Comments

Please share your comments on this page:

   



 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
Note: This site is not affiliated with nor endorsed by any military or government organization.

Copyright © 2007-2017, Answers 2000 Limited

CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED 'AS IS' AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME.
CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE,COMES FROM AMAZON EU S. r.l. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED 'AS IS' AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME.

Disclosure: Our company's websites' content (including this website's content) includes advertisements for our own company's websites, products, and services, and for other organization's websites, products, and services. In the case of links to other organization's websites, our company may receive a payment, (1) if you purchase products or services, or (2) if you sign-up for third party offers, after following links from this website. Unless specifically otherwise stated, information about other organization's products and services, is based on information provided by that organization, the product/service vendor, and/or publicly available information - and should not be taken to mean that we have used the product/service in question. Additionally, our company's websites contain some adverts which we are paid to display, but whose content is not selected by us, such as Google AdSense ads. For more detailed information, please see Advertising/Endorsements Disclosures

Our sites use cookies, some of which may already be set on your computer. Use of our site constitutes consent for this. For details, please see Privacy.

Contact Us   Privacy   Terms of Use   Advertising/Endorsements Disclosures

In Association With Amazon.com
Answers 2000 Limited is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.
In Association With Amazon.co.uk
Answers 2000 Limited is a participant in the Amazon EU Associates Programme, an affiliate advertising programme designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.co.uk.
All trademarks are property of their respective owners.
All third party content and adverts are copyright of their respective owners.